Changeset 64531 in vbox for trunk

Timestamp:

Nov 3, 2016 2:02:07 PM (8 years ago)

Author:

vboxsync

Message:

Runtime: typos

Location:

trunk/src/VBox/Runtime

Files:

• common/crypto/pkcs7-verify.cpp (modified) (1 diff)
• common/crypto/spc-template.h (modified) (1 diff)
• common/crypto/x509-certpaths.cpp (modified) (1 diff)
• common/misc/uri.cpp (modified) (1 diff)
• r3/win/mp-win.cpp (modified) (1 diff)

trunk/src/VBox/Runtime/common/crypto/pkcs7-verify.cpp

@@ -296 +296 @@
 
     /*
-     * Calculate the digest of the the authenticated attributes for use in the
+     * Calculate the digest of the authenticated attributes for use in the
      * signature validation.
      */

trunk/src/VBox/Runtime/common/crypto/spc-template.h

@@ -128 +128 @@
  *
  * Note! This is not correctly declared in available specifications. The file
- *       member is tagged.  Seeing the the '--#public--' comment in the specs,
+ *       member is tagged.  Seeing the '--#public--' comment in the specs,
  *       one can't only guess that there are other alternatives in that part
  *       of the structure that microsoft does not wish to document.

trunk/src/VBox/Runtime/common/crypto/x509-certpaths.cpp

@@ -2488 +2488 @@
  * Worker that validates one path.
  *
- * This implements the the algorithm in RFC-5280, section 6.1, with exception of
+ * This implements the algorithm in RFC-5280, section 6.1, with exception of
  * the CRL checks in 6.1.3.a.3.
  *

trunk/src/VBox/Runtime/common/misc/uri.cpp

@@ -1007 +1007 @@
      *              \---path--------------------------------------------/
      *
-     * The the two unescaped variants shouldn't be handed to rtUriParse, which
+     * The two unescaped variants shouldn't be handed to rtUriParse, which
      * is good as we cannot actually handle the one marked by (**).  So, handle
      * those two special when parsing.

trunk/src/VBox/Runtime/r3/win/mp-win.cpp

@@ -176 +176 @@
      * Query group information, partitioning CPU IDs and CPU set indexes.
      *
-     * We ASSUME the the GroupInfo index is the same as the group number.
+     * We ASSUME the GroupInfo index is the same as the group number.
      *
      * We CANNOT ASSUME that the kernel CPU indexes are assigned in any given