Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
#185 closed enhancement (wontfix)
[feature-request] Please develop compressed *.vdi images, like Qemu Qcow.
Reported by: | Technologov | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | other | Version: | VirtualBox 1.3.6 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Guest type: | other | Host type: | other |
Description
hi all !
Qemu emulator has a very nice format for Virtual Hard Disk images - they are both dynamically expanding + they are RW compressed in real-time. This can save a LOT of hard disk space for users with many VMs.
So please either develop your own format with compression, or simply use Qemu Qcow format "as-is", by porting their code over here.
-Alexey Eremenko
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 18 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
Resolution: | wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
While i agree that this can be done at other levels of the software stack, I must say it'd be good to see this feature enabled on VBox itself, since you can, for example, move the machine between different OSs, that doesn't support the same compression/encryption scheme (Windows NTFS and Linux, for example).
In my case i'd like to keep a image on my pendrive (so ti should be as small as possible), that i could carry it between work and home. And, at home, between Windows and Linux. And the fact that i could do it without leaving VBox would be very good.
So yeah, I think this is a important/interesting feature.
comment:3 by , 18 years ago
Other idea is DVD backup: Currently I make and backup dozens of VMs on DVD.
To make sure that size is small I have to use zip program.
It would be much easier if I had this feature "built-in" optionally, like Qemu.
comment:4 by , 18 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
There are two places where compression can be done: host and guest. If you don't like the host option, then you can still enble file system compression in your guest.
This is something we don't want to do. There are means to compress/encrypt volumes/directories on the host file system and it doesn't make sense to implement the same feature on different levels of the software stack.