Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#6978 closed defect (worksforme)
VirtualBox 3.2.4 on Ubuntu 10.04 amd64 fails to create New Windows VM
Reported by: | Bp | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | other | Version: | VirtualBox 3.2.4 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Guest type: | Windows | Host type: | Linux |
Description
VirtualBox 3.2.4 amd64 Ubuntu 10.04 amd64
After clean install, with no existing ~/.VirtualBox, VirtualBox fails to create a new Windows VM with a message about it already existing and some Chinese characters.
After saying 'Ok' to that message, the machine becomes "Inaccessible".
See attached screenshots.
Attachments (2)
Change History (5)
by , 15 years ago
Attachment: | vbox error.png added |
---|
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Summary: | Official VirtualBox 3.2.4 (62467) on Ubuntu 10.04 amd64 fails to create New Windows VM → VirtualBox 3.2.4 on Ubuntu 10.04 amd64 fails to create New Windows VM |
---|
Unable to reproduce. Was the ~/.VirtualBox directory successfully created after you created this VM? Are you still able to reproduce? In that case I assume that the VBoxSVC daemon crashes for some reason. In that case, are you able to provice a core dump?
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
It was creating the .VirtualBox directory each time, and all the files that you'd expect to find in there for the newly created VM were present.
I uninstalled VirtualBox 3.1, then rm -rf'ed .VirtualBox, then installed 3.2. I should have included that, also I should have included the log file. Anyway, I did that about four times, each time I removed .VirtualBox after uninstall, and it was recreated every time, and the errors came up. The UUID of the 'already existing' disk image was different each time.
After restarting, the problem is gone and I can't reproduce it anymore. It all seems to be working fine now. Sorry about not including a log or more details.
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | → worksforme |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
My suspicion is that there was still a VBoxSVC daemon running for some reason. As we cannot reproduce this problem I will close this bug. Feel free to reopen if you observe this problem again.
First error message, failed to create